Выражение встречается в следующем контексте: Это то, что едят в Америке.

Заранее спасибо

top ramen is the chipest brand of instant noodles. or top ramen is a brand of cheap instant noodles. they way u wrote it is incorrect. cheapest is the superlative form of cheap, implying that no other brand of packaged instant noodles costs more, therefore using an undefinite article would be off kilter here.

Sorry, your Highness. Thank you for taking your precious time to correct my mistakes. The only thing I can say in my excuse – no one is perfect.

the only thing i can say in my DEFENSE is ....
or, my only excuse is ...

in my excuse is gauche.

PS Как минимум ширше, чем у Game.
Во веки веков".

(подпись) Ст. Уполномоченный Измеритель всех голифе V.

Гай, отстань от девушек.
Есть более достойные объекты, чесслово - один вот например, тут притаился,... давно не слышали что-то :-)
It's getting tedious...
Ca commence a bien faire.
Franchement.

:-))))))

Не поверишь - как провидчески угадала мудрая Ириша, я имел в виду персонажа, ещё более forgettable, чем ты.

Ну, он знает :-))

2 Tal'
So if I can then borrow a page from YOUR book, buddy - it's tAnt.
Pas tEnt :-))))))))))

No, dear, I don’t use “pictorial dictionaries” (if that is what you meant; “Pictionary” is the name of a game). I have no use for them - my life, immersed into the living language, paints my linguistic canvas.

I just had a revelation: you don’t understand figurative language! Metaphors, allusions, similes are all mumbo-jumbo to you. You read everything verbatim, don’t you. And you need everything spelled out for you to clue in (like the word “sh*t” in one of my posts, before you understand what you are full of). I am sorry; I overestimated the sophistication of your mind.

I am well aware of the meaning of “cocky” (even though, in your case, I would use “smart a@s”); but you, on the other hand, appear totally oblivious to the figurative meaning of “dick/cock-measuring contest”. You might want to look it up in your “pictionary”.

There is nothing wrong with “engage myself with” (even though, in my everyday speech, I would use “involve”). By using this slightly “stuck-up” construction, I was simply mimicking your convoluted and contrived speech to give you a taste your own medicine. But now I know, such subtleties are well above your level of understanding. Next, it is also possible to say “to my taste”. It may not be the best grammatical choice, but I hear it all the time in real life. But frankly, in this case the usage of “to” was accidental – at the last moment I‘ve changed “liking” to “taste” and did not proofread the post. So, yes, I am guilty of sloppy writing! Let he who is without sin, cast the first stone. … Well, you’ve already did.

Finally, I don’t think there is any point in continuing our discussion. I don’t find you to be a fair player – you switch sides way to quickly (my head is spinning) and bend your arguments to suit your purpose: not that long ago, you flogged me publicly for being a stickler for grammar, now you’ve ordained yourself as high-priest of the Temple of Grammar, on guard of the very thing you claimed was no more. You use Google to prove your point, but dismiss it when others cite its results to support their position. You scorn dictionaries and rely on your own “linguistic sense” when it is to your benefit; yet, you are quick to appeal to the authority of dictionaries, if it helps you to beat your opponents. This is not a level playing field if you move the goalposts constantly ( “up with which we shall not put”, I say along with Winston Churchill) – conduct unbecoming a gentlemen. Well, you would not know - you’ve never been one.

Sorry for possible mistakes, which I am sure you’ll find. I do not have much time to proofread – I have places to go, people to meet, egos to destroy.

Ты же, блин, джигит, ётм...

Ну признай поражение.
Ну я тебе даже до 10 считать не буду - будем считать, допустим, что ты по очкам просто проиграл.

Ну отступись, блин, от девушек.

"дЭлом займись, дЭлом!!" (с)

Есть же более достойные, чесслово, области для недеструктивного приложения твоей энергии, аргъюабли....

plus, for somebody who likes to cloak himself in the vestments of a peacemaker, ur coming here and goading me for a reply was kind of low, don't u think? so i guess i m not the only villain here, rn't i? :-)